MLflow: MLflow CrewAI autologging records LLM provider API keys in logged trace spans
MLflow
More for MLflow RSS feed for MLflow
- Severity
- Medium, CVSS 6.5
- CVSS vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Record
- CVE-2026-116691
- Affects
- MLflow
- Known exploited
- Not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
- Published
- Record first published by the source
- October 27, 2026
- Source last modified
- October 27, 2026
Description
Summary
mlflow.crewai.autolog() leaks CrewAI LLM provider API keys into MLflow trace telemetry.
When a CrewAI Agent is instrumented with MLflow autologging, MLflow serializes the agent's __dict__ and converts its fields to strings. The llm field contains the CrewAI LLM object, whose string representation includes its api_key in plaintext.
As a result, an application that calls mlflow.crewai.autolog() can unintentionally send its LLM provider API key to the MLflow trace backend or configured OTLP destination.
The application does not need to explicitly log the credential or place it in a span attribute. The credential is extracted automatically by MLflow's instrumentation.
This was verified on MLflow 3.16.0 with CrewAI 1.15.18 using MLflow's own OTLP exporter. The fake credential appeared in 5 attribute locations across 2 spans.
Details
The primary issue is in:
mlflow/crewai/autolog.py::_get_agent_attributes()
The function walks the CrewAI Agent.__dict__ and converts agent fields to strings. tools and embedder receive special handling, but credential-bearing objects such as the following are not sanitized:
* llm
* function_calling_llm
* agent_executor
* crew
For example, agent.llm is a CrewAI LLM object. In CrewAI 1.15.18, the underlying LLM model contains api_key as a normal field. Its string representation therefore contains the credential:
llm_type='openai' model='gpt-4.1-mini' ... api_key='sk-proj-...' ...MLflow subsequently stores this string as a span attribute.
There is an important indication that this is an unintended disclosure: MLflow's dedicated LLM attribute extraction already explicitly excludes api_key in _get_llm_attributes(). The LLM span therefore does not expose the credential, while the broader Agent __dict__ serialization bypasses that protection.
There is also a second, independent serialization path in:
mlflow/crewai/autolog.py::_construct_full_inputs()
This code uses:
v.__dict__ if hasattr(v, "__dict__") else von call arguments. During CrewAI execution, the Agent object is passed as an argument, causing its __dict__ to be expanded and the credential-bearing LLM object to be included in mlflow.spanInputs.
Therefore, there are two independent leakage paths:
1. Agent span attributes through _get_agent_attributes()
2. Span inputs through _construct_full_inputs()
Fixing only the Agent attribute serialization would leave the mlflow.spanInputs path vulnerable.
A safer approach would be to avoid recursively serializing arbitrary object __dict__ values. Agent telemetry should use an explicit allowlist of non-sensitive scalar fields, and credential-bearing objects such as llm, function_calling_llm, agent_executor, and crew should either be reduced to safe metadata or omitted.
Similarly, _construct_full_inputs() should not automatically expand arbitrary objects through __dict__, or the resulting values should pass through the same sanitization mechanism before being attached to a span.
PoC
Environment:
MLflow: 3.16.0
CrewAI: 1.15.18
Python: 3.12.3
opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http: 1.42.11. Direct serialization proof
The following demonstrates the vulnerability without starting a Crew, making a network request, or requiring an MLflow server:
import importlib
from crewai import LLM, Agent
autolog = importlib.import_module("mlflow.crewai.autolog")
llm = LLM(
model="gpt-4.1-mini",
api_key="sk-proj-EXAMPLE1234567890",
)
agent = Agent(
role="r",
goal="g",
backstory="b",
llm=llm,
)
attrs = autolog._get_agent_attributes(agent)
assert "sk-proj-EXAMPLE1234567890" in attrs["llm"]
print(attrs["llm"])The output contains the API key in plaintext, for example:
llm_type='openai' model='gpt-4.1-mini' ... api_key='sk-proj-EXAMPLE1234567890' ...No provider request is required.
2. End-to-end trace disclosure
The issue can also be reproduced through MLflow's actual OTLP exporter.
Configure a local OTLP HTTP receiver and set:
export OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TRACES_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318/v1/traces
export OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TRACES_PROTOCOL=http/protobuf
export CREWAI_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=trueThen run:
import mlflow
from crewai import Agent, Crew, LLM, Task
mlflow.crewai.autolog()
llm = LLM(
model="gpt-4.1-mini",
api_key="sk-proj-EXAMPLE1234567890",
)
agent = Agent(
role="Support Responder",
goal="Answer support questions",
backstory="A support agent",
llm=llm,
)
task = Task(
description="Answer the user's question",
expected_output="A response",
agent=agent,
)
crew = Crew(
agents=[agent],
tasks=[task],
)
crew.kickoff()A local OTLP receiver can decode the ExportTraceServiceRequest sent by MLflow.
The provider request is expected to fail because the credential is intentionally fake. This does not affect the vulnerability: the sensitive value is added to the MLflow span when the instrumentation starts, before the provider call succeeds or fails.
In the tested environment, the fake API key appeared in the exported telemetry in 5 locations across 2 spans, including:
Support Responder
attributes.llm
attributes.function_calling_llm
attributes.agent_executor
attributes.mlflow.spanInputs
Task.execute_sync
attributes.mlflow.spanInputsThe captured value is produced by MLflow's actual telemetry/export path rather than being manually inserted into a span.
All credentials used in the reproduction are locally generated fake values. No real API credential is required.
Impact
Type: Sensitive Information Disclosure / Credential Disclosure CWE: CWE-532 — Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File
Any application using mlflow.crewai.autolog() with a CrewAI LLM configured with an API key can unintentionally disclose that credential [...]
Description quoted from the NVD record.